The No Surprises Act requires a written good faith estimate for uninsured and self-pay patients, covering the primary service and reasonably expected related items. Most small practices are quietly not meeting it, usually because nobody assigned the obligation to a role.
Most of the coverage around the No Surprises Act focused on balance billing and out-of-network emergencies. A quieter provision applies to every practice: uninsured and self-pay patients are entitled to a written estimate before scheduled care.
Who it covers
Patients with no insurance, and patients who have insurance but choose not to use it for the service. The second group is easy to miss — someone paying cash for a visit their plan would cover is a self-pay patient for this purpose.
What it has to contain
- The expected charges for the primary service and items reasonably expected with it.
- Service and diagnosis codes.
- Provider details.
- Delivery in writing, within a timeframe tied to when the service was scheduled or requested.
The "reasonably expected with it" part is what practices underestimate. An estimate covering only the office visit, when labs and a procedure are anticipated, is not a complete estimate.
Why practices are not doing it
Mostly because nobody told them. The rule arrived alongside hospital-focused requirements and the practice-level obligation got lost. It also requires the front desk to identify self-pay status at scheduling rather than at check-in, which is a workflow change rather than a form.
The operational version
Flag self-pay at scheduling. Keep an estimate template per common service. Deliver in writing, keep a copy, and note the date. It is not a large amount of work once the trigger exists — the difficulty is entirely in noticing that it applies.
Make it a trigger, not a request
The obligation attaches at scheduling for self-pay patients, which means it has to fire from the scheduling workflow rather than waiting for someone to ask about price.
A flag on the appointment type, a template populated from the fee schedule, and a named owner is the whole implementation. Practices that treat it as an ad hoc courtesy are the ones not meeting it.
Include the related items
The estimate covers the primary service and items reasonably expected with it — pathology, anesthesia, facility components where you can foresee them. An estimate for the procedure alone understates the total and is the version most likely to be disputed.
Keep the copy
Retain what was given and when. The dispute process turns on comparing the bill to the estimate, and a practice that cannot produce the estimate it issued is arguing from memory.
Where the estimate goes wrong in practice
Two failures dominate. The estimate covers only the primary service, omitting pathology, anesthesia or facility components that the patient will be billed for separately. And it is produced from charges rather than from what the practice actually intends to collect from a self-pay patient.
Both produce a final bill materially above the estimate, which is precisely the situation the dispute process exists for.
Co-provider items complicate it
Where other providers will bill separately for related items, the rules contemplate their inclusion. In practice that requires knowing who else is involved and what they charge, which is difficult for a small practice.
At minimum, tell the patient which separate bills to expect even where you cannot state the amounts.
Build it into scheduling software
An estimate that requires someone to remember is an estimate that will be produced inconsistently. A flag on self-pay appointment types that generates a templated estimate from the self-pay schedule turns compliance into a default.
Common questions
- Who needs a good faith estimate?
- Uninsured patients and insured patients who choose not to use their coverage for a service. It is triggered by scheduling or by the patient asking about cost.
- What has to be in a good faith estimate?
- Patient and provider identifiers, a description of the primary service, expected charges, relevant codes, and reasonably expected related items and services.
- When must the estimate be provided?
- Within defined timeframes tied to how far ahead the service is scheduled, and on request. Waiting for the patient to ask is not a compliant process.
- Does it apply to insured patients?
- The requirement centers on uninsured and self-pay patients. Giving insured patients an accurate estimate is good practice but a different obligation.
- What happens if a practice does not provide one?
- Beyond the compliance exposure, patients have a dispute route when billed substantially above an estimate — and having no estimate is a weak position in that process.
Denials Piling Up?
We handle the revenue cycle end to end — coding by certified coders, claim submission, denial management and appeals, and A/R follow-up, with six reported numbers every month.